News
Hackers Respond to Users After Internet Archive Breach Raises Concerns
In a troubling development, users of the Internet Archive have begun receiving peculiar emails that appear to be responses from hackers who recently b
In a troubling development, users of the Internet Archive have begun receiving peculiar emails that appear to be responses from hackers who recently breached the site. This alarming revelation was first reported by Wes Davis, a tech journalist at The Verge, who experienced this firsthand. Emails purportedly from the “Internet Archive Team” show that the hackers may still maintain access to the system, raising serious concerns about user data security.
On October 9, Wes Davis had reached out to the Internet Archive regarding the breach, but rather than a support team response, he received a message from hackers. Other users are echoing similar experiences on the Internet Archive subreddit, indicating a widespread issue. The email Davis received highlighted a disheartening reality: the Internet Archive has not effectively rotated many of the API keys that were compromised, including a Zendesk token that can access over 800,000 support tickets sent to info@archive.org since 2018.
This means that personal inquiries, including users’ requests to remove their sites from the Wayback Machine, may now be in the hands of unauthorized individuals. As these communications continue to roll in, the anxiety surrounding the breach deepens, with users left wondering about the safety of their personal information. The need for swift and proactive measures by the Internet Archive has never been more critical.
Amidst the ongoing turmoil, the Internet Archive is attempting to restore its functionality after the breach, gradually bringing services back online, including the beloved Wayback Machine. Founder Brewster Kahle assured users in a blog post dated October 17 that the team is working diligently around the clock, transcending time zones to expedite the restoration of the site’s offerings. However, the extensive archive—home to an immense collection of books, software, images, and videos—remains largely inaccessible at the moment.
As services return, it’s important to note that the Internet Archive will initially operate in read-only mode, signaling that full restoration will take considerably longer. The reason behind the breach still remains ambiguous, leaving the organization and its users in suspense. In remarks to The Washington Post, Kahle expressed bewilderment, asking, “Why kick the cat?” as he reflected on the enigmatic motives behind the digital assault.
The situation continues to evolve, and many are left hopeful that the Internet Archive will soon resolve these issues and enhance its security measures to prevent any future breaches. Meanwhile, users are urged to stay vigilant and reassess the implications of sharing personal information on platforms that may not be entirely secure. As more details unfold, it remains to be seen how the Internet Archive will recover from this significant challenge to its integrity and service.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities that digital repositories can face, especially those like the Internet Archive that house vast amounts of data with historical and cultural importance. The community watches closely for updates, hoping for a swift recovery and reassurance of their privacy and data safety.
